SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
01-december-2022
Razvoj odpornosti mest - Vodnik za združevanje obvladovanja tveganja nesreč in
prilagajanja podnebnim spremembam - Zgodovinska območja
City Resilience Development - Guide to combine disaster risk management and climate
change adaptation - Historic areas
Entwicklung resilienter Städte - Leitfaden zur Kombination von
Katastrophenrisikomanagement und Anpassung an den Klimawandel - Historische
Gebiete
Développement des villes résilientes - Guide pour combiner la gestion des risques de
catastrophe et l’adaptation au changement climatique - Zones historiques
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CWA 17727:2022
ICS:
13.020.01 Okolje in varstvo okolja na Environment and
splošno environmental protection in
general
13.200 Preprečevanje nesreč in Accident and disaster control
katastrof
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022


CEN
CWA 17727

WORKSHOP
September 2022

AGREEMENT


ICS 13.020; 13.200
English version


City Resilience Development - Guide to combine disaster
risk management and climate change adaptation - Historic
areas
This CEN Workshop Agreement has been drafted and approved by a Workshop of representatives of interested parties, the
constitution of which is indicated in the foreword of this Workshop Agreement.

The formal process followed by the Workshop in the development of this Workshop Agreement has been endorsed by the
National Members of CEN but neither the National Members of CEN nor the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre can be held
accountable for the technical content of this CEN Workshop Agreement or possible conflicts with standards or legislation.

This CEN Workshop Agreement can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CEN and its Members.

This CEN Workshop Agreement is publicly available as a reference document from the CEN Members National Standard Bodies.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North
Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and United Kingdom.



EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2022 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members.


Ref. No.:CWA 17727:2022 E

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)
Contents Page
European foreword . 4
Introduction . 6
1 Scope . 8
2 Normative references . 8
3 Terms and definitions . 8
4 Characterisation of historic areas . 12
5 General information . 13
6 Pre-disaster – Normal operating phase . 15
6.1 Prepare the ground . 15
6.1.1 General information . 15
6.1.2 Requirements . 15
6.1.3 Recommendations . 16
6.1.4 Supporting materials and tools . 17
6.2 Assess vulnerabilities and risks . 17
6.2.1 General information . 17
6.2.2 Requirements . 18
6.2.3 Recommendations . 18
6.2.4 Supporting materials and tools . 19
6.3 Identify risk prevention, mitigation, climate change adaptation and emergency
response measures. 20
6.3.1 General information . 20
6.3.2 Requirements . 20
6.3.3 Recommendations . 21
6.3.4 Supporting materials and tools . 21
6.4 Assess and select resilience measures and procedures . 22
6.4.1 General information . 22
6.4.2 Requirements . 22
6.4.3 Recommendations . 23
6.4.4 Supporting materials and tools . 23
6.5 Implement selected measures . 24
6.5.1 General information . 24
6.5.2 Requirements . 24
6.5.3 Recommendations . 24
6.5.4 Supporting materials and tools . 25
6.6 Establish resilience monitoring, evaluation and learning processes . 25
6.6.1 General information . 25
6.6.2 Requirements . 26
6.6.3 Recommendations . 27
6.6.4 Supporting materials and tools . 27
7 During disaster – Emergency operating phase . 28
7.1 Conduct emergency response procedures . 28
7.1.1 General information . 28
7.1.2 Requirements . 28
2

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

7.1.3 Recommendations . 28
7.1.4 Supporting materials and tools . 29
8 Post-disaster – Emergency operating phase . 30
8.1 Assess needs and impacts . 30
8.1.1 General information . 30
8.1.2 Requirements . 30
8.1.3 Recommendations . 30
8.1.4 Supporting materials and tools . 30
8.2 Stabilise situation . 31
8.2.1 General information . 31
8.2.2 Requirements . 31
8.2.3 Recommendations . 32
8.2.4 Supporting materials and tools . 33
8.3 Recover and building back better. 33
8.3.1 General information . 33
8.3.2 Requirements . 33
8.3.3 Recommendations . 34
8.3.4 Supporting materials and tools . 35
9 New cycle . 35
Annex A (informative) Template to characterise historic areas . 37
Annex B (informative) Indicators per step of the DRM/CCA Framework . 44
Bibliography . 50

3

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

European foreword
This CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA 17727:2022) has been developed in accordance with the CEN-
CENELEC Guide 29 “CEN/CENELEC Workshop Agreements – A rapid prototyping to standardisation” and
with the relevant provisions of CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations – Part 2. It was approved by a
Workshop of representatives of interested parties on 2022-04-28, the constitution of which was
supported by CEN following the public call for participation made on 2021-04-22. However, this CEN
Workshop Agreement does not necessarily include all relevant stakeholders.
The final text of this CEN Workshop Agreement was provided to CEN for publication on 2022-07-11.
Results incorporated in this CEN Workshop Agreement received funding from the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement numbers 820999 (ARCH),
821282 (SHELTER), and 833671 (RESILOC).
The following organisations and individuals developed and approved this CEN Workshop Agreement:
 Engage Liverpool / Diana Heredia
 Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS / Daniel Lückerath,
Katharina Milde, Valerie Wischott
 Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics IML / Karsten Uhing
 ICLEI European Secretariat / Vasileios-Panagiotis Latinos, Katherine Peinhardt, Cristina Garzillo
 Independent Advisor / Pierluigi Potenza
 Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development /
Sonia Giovinazzi
 Las Naves / Emilio Servera
 Ministry of Culture and Media Hamburg – Department for Heritage Preservation / Bernd
Paulowitz, Uta Mense
 Municipality of Camerino / Quintilio Piattoni
 NA 005-01-36 AA Conservation of cultural heritage (German national mirror committee for
CEN/TC 346) / Wolfgang Karl Göhner
 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens / Vassilis Papataxiarhis
 National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV) / Antonio Costanzo
 Polytechnic University of Bari / Silvana Bruno, Elena Cantatore, Mariella Defino, Fabio Fatiguso,
Dario Esposito
 Polytechnic University of Madrid / Maria Aurora Flórez de la Colina
 Prague University of Economics and Business / Zdenka Petru
4

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

 Research for Science, Art and Technology (RFSAT) Limited / Artur Krukowski
 SISTEMA / Marco Folegani, Maria Luisa Quarta
 Tecnalia Research and Innovation / Aitziber Egusquiza Ortega, Saioa Zorita, Efren Feliu
 UNI/CT 058 Sustainable Cities, Communities and Infrastructures / Pasquale Capezzuto
 University of Navarra – School of Engineering / Josune Hernantes Apezetxea, Leire Labaka
Zubieta
 University of the Basque Country / Laura Quesada
 Urban Innovation Vienna / Johannes Hofinger
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some elements of this document may be subject to patent rights.
CEN-CENELEC policy on patent rights is described in CEN-CENELEC Guide 8 “Guidelines for
Implementation of the Common IPR Policy on Patent”. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying
any or all such patent rights.
Although the Workshop parties have made every effort to ensure the reliability and accuracy of technical
and non-technical descriptions, the Workshop is not able to guarantee, explicitly or implicitly, the
correctness of this document. Anyone who applies this CEN Workshop Agreement shall be aware that
neither the Workshop, nor CEN, can be held liable for damages or losses of any kind whatsoever. The use
of this CEN Workshop Agreement does not relieve users of their responsibility for their own actions, and
they apply this document at their own risk. The CEN Workshop Agreement should not be construed as
legal advice authoritatively endorsed by CEN/CENELEC.
5

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

Introduction
Resilience of historic areas
While negative impacts of climate-related and other hazards on urban areas are widely discussed in
contemporary literature and research, their impacts on cities and communities, which are inextricably
linked to historic areas, have not yet been studied extensively. Combined work on disaster risk reduction
and climate change adaptation in and for historic areas, with their unique structure, calls for advanced
technologies, models, methods, processes and tools. To make a historic area resilient, the local
community, municipal staff, practitioners and decision-makers need to address both the chronic stresses
posed by climate change as well as the shocks and existing risks posed by other disasters. However, to
date, typical management frameworks for disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change
adaptation (CCA) still consider shocks and chronic stresses in isolation. Furthermore, the term “city
resilience” or additionally, “community resilience” can mean many different things to different actors,
depending on the context in which it is applied.
The ARCH DRM/CCA Framework
The aim of the CEN/WS ARCH, a temporary working group, was to further develop the ARCH Project’s
DRM/CCA Framework, together with a broader community of experts, including municipal staff. The
framework was created to help, for example, practitioners, decision-makers, heritage managers, public
administrators, and other actors in the field of DRM, CCA, and historic area management to:
– acknowledge the need for socially just resilience building activities,
– understand which steps are necessary to develop a Resilience Action Plan that combines DRM and
CCA processes and that takes into account the needs and opportunities of historic areas when
building resilience,
– provide guidance on how to operationalize the different steps of the DRM/CCA Framework,
– provide guidance on which stakeholders to involve in each step of the DRM/CCA Framework,
– provide a conceptual structure for the use of different supporting tools and materials within the steps
of the DRM/CCA Framework.
The content in this document is based on the DRM/CCA Framework of the ARCH project, which centres
on historic areas. Nonetheless, the DRM/CCA Framework can also be applied to other use cases in other
parts of a given city, not necessarily only on historic areas.
The framework is based on the DRM cycle proposed by Jigyasu, King, and Wijesuriya in the UNESCO
manual on managing disaster risk for world heritage [1] as a starting basis and extends it with the climate
change adaptation planning cycle of Climate ADAPT’s Urban Adaptation Support Tool [2]. This combined
planning cycle is then further extended with considerations from topic-specific frameworks relevant to
historic areas, like the Culture in City Reconstruction and Recovery Framework [3], the SMR European
Resilience Management Guideline [4], and the RESIN Conceptual Framework [5].
CWA 17300 series on “City Resilience Development”
This document complements the already existing standards series CWA 17300 on “City Resilience
Development”. This supports the uptake and consideration of the standards content in relation to
enhance resilience in cities and communities. The standards series consists of the following documents:
– CWA 17300 City Resilience Development – Operational Framework
– CWA 17301 City Resilience Development – Maturity Model
6

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

– CWA 17302 City Resilience Development – Information Portal
The CWA on Operational Guidance is the overarching document that refers to the CWA 17301 City
Resilience Development – Maturity Model, the CWA 17302 City Resilience Development – Information
Portal, as well as to other supporting tools.
Technical Committees
The cross-sectoral topic of disaster risk management and climate change adaptation of historic areas is
discussed in the following Technical Committee:
– CEN/TC 346 Conservation of cultural heritage,
– ISO/TC 292 Societal and citizen security,
– ISO/TC 268 Sustainable cities and communities,
– ISO/TC 207/SC 7 Greenhouse gas and climate change management and related activities.
Wherever possible, the document refers to existing standards from the above mentioned Technical
Committees.
7

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

1 Scope
The document specifies a resilience-building framework for historic areas within cities and communities
that defines and combines disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation (CCA)
activities in an integrated approach. The framework is applicable for historic areas that face natural and
climate change-induced hazards. The framework includes a:
– characterisation of historic areas and their exposure to natural and climate change-induced hazards,
– set of requirements and recommendations on how historic areas can become more resilient,
– step-by-step process to manage disasters, and to perform and monitor resilience-building activities.
This document is intended to be used by decision makers and technical staff at the city/community and
historic area levels, as well as by councillors working on risk and vulnerability assessment, climate
change adaptation and resilience enhancement. Other stakeholders who may wish to use the document
include disaster risk managers, heritage managers, public administrators, sustainability and resilience
officers, critical infrastructure managers, service providers, emergency service providers, civil society
associations, non-governmental organisations, academic and research institutions, as well as
consultancies.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardisation at the following addresses:
 ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
 IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1
chronic stress
underlying human and natural pressure or tension that causes persistent negative impacts relating to
environmental degradation, social inequality and economic instability
[SOURCE: ISO 37123:2019, definition 3.9, modified — “chronic” was added, “in a city” and the examples
were deleted]
3.2
city
human settlement formed by a central area, neighbourhoods and suburbs reciprocally connected but not
necessarily coincident with administrative boundaries, and inclusive of all the urban stakeholders that
play key roles in its functioning
[SOURCE: CWA 17300:2018, definition 3.5]
3.3
climate change
change in climate that persists for an extended period, typically decades or longer
8

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

NOTE 1 to entry: to entry: Climate change can be identified by such means as statistical tests (e.g. on changes in the
mean variability).
NOTE 2 to entry: to entry: Climate change might be due to natural processes, internal to the climate system, or
external forcing such as modulations of the solar cycles, volcanic eruptions, and persistent anthropogenic changes
in the composition of the atmosphere or in land use.
[SOURCE: ISO 14090:2019, definition 3.5]
3.4
climate change adaptation
process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects
NOTE 1 to entry: to entry: In human systems, adaptations seeks to moderate or avoid harm or exploit beneficial
opportunities.
NOTE 2 to entry: to entry: In some natural systems, human intervention can facilitate adjustment to expected
climate and its effects.
[SOURCE: ISO 14090:2019, definition 3.1]
3.5
disaster
situation where widespread human, material, economic or environmental losses have occurred which
exceeded the ability of the affected organisation, community or society to respond and recover using its
own resources
[SOURCE: ISO 22300:2021, definition 3.1.73]
3.6
disaster risk reduction
application of policies aimed at preventing new and reducing existing disaster risk and managing residual
risk, all of which contribute to strengthening resilience and therefore to the achievement of sustainable
development
[SOURCE: ISO 22300:2021, definition 3.1.74, modified — “policy aimed” changed to “application of
policies aimed”]
3.7
emergency
sudden, urgent, usually unexpected occurrence or event requiring immediate action
EXAMPLE Child falls into a fast running river.
[SOURCE: ISO 22300:2021, definition 3.1.87, modified — example was added]
3.8
framework
system of requirements and recommendations designed to support the accomplishment of disaster risk
management and climate change adaptation (3.4)
9

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

3.9
hazard
source of potential harm
[SOURCE: ISO 22300:2021, definition 3.1.110]
3.10
historic area
any group of buildings, structures and open spaces including archaeological and paleontological sites,
constituting human settlements in an urban or rural environment, the cohesion and value of which, from
the prehistoric, archaeological, architectural, industrial, historic, aesthetic or sociocultural point of view
are recognized
EXAMPLE Prehistoric sites, historic towns, old urban quarters, villages and hamlets as well as homogeneous
monumental groups.
[SOURCE: Adapted from UNESCO Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role
of Historic Areas. Nairobi, 1976]
3.11
historic urban landscape
urban area understood as the result of a historic layering of cultural and natural values and attributes,
extending beyond the notion of “historic centre” or “ensemble” to include the broader urban context and
its geographical setting
[SOURCE: UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape adopted by the General
Conference at its 36th session]
3.12
impact
evaluated consequence of a particular outcome
[SOURCE: IEC 62443-3-3 Corrigendum 1:2014, definition 3.1.27]
3.13
resilience
ability of a historic area (3.10) as a social-ecological system (3.21) to cope with hazard (3.9) by responding
and adapting in socially just ways that maintain the historic area’s functions and heritage significance
(including identity, integrity, authenticity)
3.14
resilience action plan
plan outlining actions to improve a long-term or overall resilience objective
[SOURCE: ISO 9000:2015, definition 3.5.12, modified — “resilience”, “outlining actions“ was added]
3.15
resilience building process
sequence of resilience (3.13) enhancing activities
3.16
risk
effect of uncertainty
10

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

NOTE 1 to entry: to entry: An effect is a deviation from the expected. It can be positive, negative or both. An effect
can arise as a result of a response, or failure to respond, to an opportunity or to a threat to objectives.
NOTE 2 to entry: to entry: Uncertainty is the state, even partial, of deficiency of information related to,
understanding or knowledge of, an event, its consequence, or likelihood.
[SOURCE: ISO 14090:2019, definition 3.12]
3.17
risk assessment
overall process of risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation
[SOURCE: ISO 22300:2018, definition 3.203]
3.18
risk mitigation
lessening or minimising of the adverse impacts of a hazardous event
[SOURCE: ISO 22300:2018, definition 3.1.225]
3.19
risk prevention
process of either avoiding risks or reducing their probability
3.20
shock
natural or man-made event that causes a disaster (3.5)
EXAMPLE Flood, earthquake, volcanic eruption, hurricane, wildfire, pandemic.
[SOURCE: ISO 37123:2019, definition 3.8]
3.21
social-ecological system
SES
complex system of people and nature, emphasizing that humans are seen as a part of, not apart from,
nature
[SOURCE: Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (Eds.). (2000). Linking social and ecological systems:
management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press.]
3.22
sustainability
ability of a system to be maintained for the present and future generations
[SOURCE: EN 16627:2015, definition 3.62]
3.23
vulnerability
intrinsic properties of something resulting in susceptibility to a risk source that can lead to an event with
a consequence
11

---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
SIST-TP CWA 17727:2022
CWA 17727:2022 (E)

[SOURCE: ISO Guide 73:2009, definition 3.6.1.6]
4 Characterisation of historic areas
This clause defines a template that should be filled out by the end users of the document to characterise
the historic area of concern and the hazards it faces. The template assumes an understanding of a historic
area as a social-ecological system (see Figure 1) that consists of the built and natural environments which
make up the ecological system, and the social, cultural, economic, and policy aspects w
...